Why Mutual Fund Ratings Are Not Always the Best Way to Select a Fund
Table of Contents
When investing in mutual funds, it can be tempting to rely on mutual fund ratings to narrow down your options and make a selection.
Many investors would not purchase without first researching funds rating. Some people base their selections solely on ratings.
When you read about fund ratings, it may appear that buying the ones with the most stars is the ideal method for choosing your funds.
But be cautious. Most fund rating systems focus mainly on recent performance figures—which would be fine if a fund’s past success predicted its future performance. In general, however, it does not.
In fact, a recent sequence of excellent performances shows that a performance lag may be on the horizon.
It’s fine to look into a fund to see how it’s ranked and why—just don’t use ratings as the primary foundation for your selection.
“Trying to pick a stock’s future growth path based on past growth is like trying to guess if a coin will come up heads or tails when you know that the last toss was a head. The previous toss tells you nothing.”
However, it’s important to understand that mutual fund ratings are not always the best way to select a mutual fund.
Here are a few reasons why:
Ratings can be subjective
Mutual fund ratings are typically assigned by research firms or financial publications, and the criteria they use to evaluate funds can vary significantly. As a result, a fund that is highly rated by one firm may be less highly rated by another. This subjectivity can make it difficult to accurately compare mutual funds based on ratings alone.
Ratings may not consider all factors
While mutual fund ratings can provide a general sense of a fund’s performance, they may not consider all factors that could impact a fund’s returns. For example, a rating may not consider the fund’s fees, which can significantly impact your investment returns over time.
Past performance is not indicative of future results
It’s important to remember that mutual fund ratings are typically based on a fund’s past performance. While a fund with solid past returns may seem like a good choice, there’s no guarantee that it will continue to perform well in the future. Studies have shown that mutual funds that have outperformed in the past are not necessarily the ones that will outperform in the future.
Ratings do not consider your financial situation
When selecting a mutual fund, it’s important to consider your financial goals, risk tolerance, and investment time horizon. Mutual fund ratings may not consider these factors, so it’s important to do your due diligence and choose a fund that aligns with your financial situation.
While mutual fund ratings can be a useful resource, they should not be the sole factor in your decision-making process. Instead, consider using ratings as one piece of the puzzle and consider other factors such as a fund’s performance, fees, diversification, and alignment with your financial situation. It’s also a good idea to seek the guidance of a financial advisor who can help you make informed decisions about your investment strategy.